WWE Matches That Were Restarted After Controversial Endings

From botched finishes to disputed results, these WWE matches were restarted due to controversial outcomes.

Last updated:

WWE is known for its high-stakes matches, larger-than-life characters, and intense rivalries. However, not every match goes according to plan. On occasion, controversies arise, whether due to botched finishes, referee errors, or unexpected interference, leading to matches being restarted. These moments often leave fans frustrated, confused, or even thrilled at the possibility of a rematch. Sometimes, these events are used to further storylines or set up even bigger showdowns. Let’s take a look at some of the most notable WWE matches that were restarted because of controversial endings, keeping fans on the edge of their seats.

1. The Rock vs. Mankind – WWE Championship (Royal Rumble 1999)

The Rock vs. Mick Foley (Image via Getty)

At the Royal Rumble 1999, The Rock defended his WWE Championship against Mankind in an “I Quit” match. The match ended under suspicious circumstances when The Rock repeatedly struck Mankind with a steel chair, and the referee mistakenly assumed Mankind had said, “I quit.” However, the mic was clearly not picking up any verbal confirmation from Mankind. To make matters worse, Mankind was barely conscious after enduring a brutal chair assault, leading many fans to question the legitimacy of the ending.

The controversy didn’t end there. The match was restarted after Vince McMahon, who had been heavily involved in the storyline, stepped in to declare that the ending was not legitimate. This led to a continuation of the brutal contest, with Mankind eventually losing to The Rock. The restart was a key moment in the feud, setting the stage for a classic rivalry between the two, and was one of the most memorable and debated finishes in WWE history.

2. Brock Lesnar vs. The Undertaker – Hell in a Cell Match (No Mercy 2002)

Brock Lesnar vs. The Undertaker (Image via Getty)

When Brock Lesnar faced The Undertaker in a Hell in a Cell match at No Mercy 2002, the result was marred by a highly questionable decision. The match had already reached a fever pitch, with both superstars taking each other to the limit. However as the match neared its conclusion, a controversial pinfall occurred when Brock Lesnar seemingly pinned The Undertaker after hitting him with a steel chair. However, the referee’s position was less than ideal, and there was a lack of clear evidence to confirm that The Undertaker was truly pinned.

This confusion led to the match being restarted to ensure a legitimate ending. The tension was palpable, as fans were eager to see who would walk away victorious after such an intense contest. After the restart, the match continued, and Lesnar ultimately pinned The Undertaker in a decisive manner, solidifying his dominance. The controversy around the original finish and the restart helped cement the match as a landmark moment in both men’s careers, despite the initial confusion.

3. Vince McMahon vs. Stone Cold Steve Austin – Referee’s Decision (St. Valentine’s Day Massacre 1999)

Stone Cold Steve Austin vs. Vince McMahon (Image via Getty)

At St. Valentine’s Day Massacre in 1999, Vince McMahon and Stone Cold Steve Austin clashed in a highly anticipated match. The two were involved in a heated rivalry, with Austin looking to exact revenge on McMahon, who had become the corporate figurehead of WWE. The match featured plenty of brawling, interference, and high-stakes drama, but the controversial finish came when the referee made a questionable call.

After McMahon seemingly pinned Austin, the referee’s decision was met with immediate backlash from the audience. Fans felt that the count had been too quick and that McMahon had not properly secured the pin. The controversy led to the match being restarted, as the referee admitted that the call had been incorrect. With the stakes higher than ever, Austin was eventually able to overcome McMahon, leading to one of the most satisfying moments in the history of their rivalry. The restart was a necessary part of the storyline, ensuring that the iconic feud continued to fascinate audiences.

4. Seth Rollins vs. John Cena – United States Championship (SummerSlam 2015)

Seth Rollins vs. John Cena (Image via Getty)

The 2015 SummerSlam match between Seth Rollins and John Cena for the United States Championship had one of the most unique and controversial finishes in recent history. The two men had been involved in an intense rivalry for months, with Cena holding the prestigious title at the time. During the match, Cena was able to hit Rollins with an Attitude Adjustment, but the pinfall was interrupted by a technical malfunction in the arena.

While Cena was pinning Rollins, the referee appeared to have counted too quickly and improperly, which led to confusion and frustration from the audience. Many fans speculated that the malfunction was deliberate, as the match had been building toward an even bigger climax. In response to the controversy, the match was restarted by WWE officials, ensuring a fair conclusion to what had been a thrilling encounter.

With both competitors at their peak, the restart provided a fresh sense of urgency. Rollins went on to defeat Cena, reclaiming the United States Championship. The controversy surrounding the initial ending only heightened the drama, making the eventual resolution even more satisfying for fans. The match is remembered not only for the fierce competition but also for the dramatic restart that gave Rollins a chance to prove his worth as champion.

Why WWE Restarts Matches After Controversial Ends

When WWE officials restart a match after a controversial finish, it serves multiple purposes. First, it allows the company to address potential fan dissatisfaction, ensuring that the result feels legitimate and unscripted. WWE prides itself on delivering moments that feel genuine, and restarting a match is a way to correct any mistakes that might have negatively impacted the fan experience.

Additionally, these restarts often serve to fuel ongoing storylines. By revisiting a match and having the competitors face off once again, WWE can extend rivalries, build anticipation for future events, and even create new plot twists. These moments can help certain superstars and ensure that key feuds remain fresh and exciting for audiences.

WWE’s Commitment to Delivering the Best Entertainment

WWE’s decision to restart matches after controversial endings showcases its commitment to delivering a satisfying and cohesive narrative to fans. Whether through referee errors, technical difficulties, or just plain bad luck, these match restarts often create some of the most memorable moments in WWE history. From the intense rivalry between The Rock and Mankind to the epic battles between Stone Cold and Vince McMahon, these controversies only enhance the storytelling aspect of professional wrestling.

As WWE continues to evolve, it’s clear that these controversial moments will remain a part of the company’s rich history. Fans will always remember the times when a match was restarted, and the anticipation that followed that decision. In the end, it’s all about ensuring that the audience gets the outcome they deserve—and that’s what makes WWE truly unforgettable.